Hi, I only had a glance at the
Introduction. I think their results might be credible. But isn't
this known in Econometrics as weak identification?
Because weak identification is a long-study problem in
Macroeconometrics and also in DSGE model. It might be that their
results are just consequences of weak identification.
The paper does not mention weak identification. I was expecting a discussion of this.
For example, Fernéndez-Villaverde
(2010) in his survey of DSGE estimation writes: "likelihoods of
DSGE models are
full of local maxima and minima and of nearly at surfaces... the
standard errors of
the estimates are notoriously didifficult to compute and their
asymptotic distribution a
poor approximation to the small sample one."
So it is possible to get weird results if one does not have strong identification.
Best,
Alessandro
">Caro Gianluca,
Buon Anno anche a te! Grazie per la segnalazione del paper: sembra molto interessante e lo leggerò con cura. Da un primo sguardo ho l'impressione che confermi quanto già pensavo riguardo a questi modelli.
Un caro saluto,
Pasquale
Quoting Gianluca Cubadda ">< >:
First of all, happy new year to you all!
Here it is another paper that is raising lots of discussions:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16224
I don't know if those results have already been formally checked.
Ciao,
Gianluca
Pasquale Scaramozzino
Professore di Economia Politica
Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza
Facoltà di Economia
Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"
via Columbia, 2
00133 Roma
Italy
pho. 0039 06 7259 5727
fax 0039 06 2020 500
http://economia.uniroma2.it/def/faculty/229/scaramozzino-pasquale
http://ideas.repec.org/e/psc186.html
-- Alessandro Casini ( "> ) Department of Economics and Finance University of Rome Tor Vergata Via Columbia 2 00133 Rome, Italy http://alessandro-casini.com
Archivio con motore MhonArc 2.6.16.