[ceis_seminars_phd] ERN CEIS: Centre for Economic & International Studies Working Paper Series, Vol. 14 No. 1, 02/10/2016


Cronologico Percorso di conversazione 
  • From: "Barbara Piazzi" < >
  • To: "'Barbara Piazzi'" < >
  • Subject: [ceis_seminars_phd] ERN CEIS: Centre for Economic & International Studies Working Paper Series, Vol. 14 No. 1, 02/10/2016
  • Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:31:38 +0100

Title: CEIS: Centre for Economic & International Studies Working Paper Series :: SSRN

Web Bug from http://hq.ssrn.com/journals/TrackIssueOpening.cfm?partid=342361&deliveryid=285005

if this message does not display correctly, click here

 

Table of Contents

Giancarlo Spagnolo, Stockholm School of Economics (SITE), Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', EIEF
Decio Coviello, University of Roma "Tor Vergata"
Andrea Guglielmo, University of Wisconsin - Madison

Mauro Bernardi, University of Padova
Leopoldo Catania, University of Rome, Tor Vergata - Department of Economics and Finance

Leonardo Becchetti, University of Rome, Tor Vergata - Faculty of Economics
Vittorio Pelligra, Universita di Cagliari - Department of Economics
Serena Taurino, University of Rome Tor Vergata


CEIS: CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Vincenzo Atella - Director

"The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance" Free Download
CEIS Working Paper No. 361

GIANCARLO SPAGNOLO, Stockholm School of Economics (SITE), Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', EIEF
Email: ">
DECIO COVIELLO,
University of Roma "Tor Vergata"
Email: ">
ANDREA GUGLIELMO,
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Email: ">

We run a regression discontinuity design analysis to document the causal effect of increasing buyers' discretion on procurement outcomes in a large database for public works in Italy. Works with a value above a given threshold have to be awarded through an open auction. Works below this threshold can be more easily awarded through a restricted auction, where the buyer has some discretion in terms of who (not) to invite to bid. Our main result is that discretion increases the probability that the same firm wins repeatedly, and it does not deteriorate (and may improve) the procurement outcomes we observe. The effects of discretion persist when we repeat the analysis controlling for the geographical location, corruption, social capital and judicial efficiency in the region of the public buyers running the auctions.

"The Model Confidence Set Package for R" Free Download
CEIS Working Paper No. 362

MAURO BERNARDI, University of Padova
Email: ">
LEOPOLDO CATANIA,
University of Rome, Tor Vergata - Department of Economics and Finance
Email: ">

This paper presents the R package MCS which implements the Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure recently developed by Hansen, Lunde, and Nason (2011). The Hansen's procedure consists on a sequence of tests which permits to construct a set of "superior" models, where the null hypothesis of Equal Predictive Ability (EPA) is not rejected at a certain confidence level. The EPA statistic tests is calculated for an arbitrary loss function, meaning that we could test models on various aspects, for example punctual forecasts. The relevance of the package is shown using an example which aims at illustrating in details the use of the functions provided by the package. The example compares the ability of different models belonging to the ARCH family to predict large financial losses. We also discuss the implementation of the ARCH-type models and their maximum likelihood estimation using the popular R package rugarch developed by Ghalanos (2014).

"Other Regarding Preferences and Reciprocity: Insights from Experimental Findings and Satisfaction Data" Free Download
CEIS Working Paper No. 363

LEONARDO BECCHETTI, University of Rome, Tor Vergata - Faculty of Economics
Email: ">
VITTORIO PELLIGRA,
Universita di Cagliari - Department of Economics
Email: ">
SERENA TAURINO,
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Email: ">

We measure satisfaction about experimental outcomes, personal and other participants' behaviour after a multiperiod "hybrid contribution" multiplayer prisoner's dilemma called the "vote with the wallet" game. Our work shows that participants who cooperated above median (which we defi
ne as strong cooperators) are signi
ficantly more satis
ed with the game in proportion to their cooperative choice. On the contrary, their satisfaction for the other players' behavior is negatively correlated with the extent of their own cooperative behavior and the non-cooperative behavior of the latter. The satisfaction of strong cooperators for their behavior in the game depends in turn on the share of their own cooperative choices. We document that a broader utility function including heterogeneity in expectations on other players' behavior, other-regarding preferences, and a negative reciprocity argument may account for the combination of the observed experimental and satisfaction fi
ndings.

^top


About this eJournal

Submissions

To submit your research to SSRN, sign in to the SSRN User HeadQuarters, click the My Papers link on left menu and then the Start New Submission button at top of page.

Distribution Services

If your organization is interested in increasing readership for its research by starting a Research Paper Series, or sponsoring a Subject Matter eJournal, please email: ">

Distributed by

Economics Research Network (ERN), a division of Social Science Electronic Publishing (SSEP) and Social Science Research Network (SSRN)

Directors

ECONOMICS RESEARCH CENTERS PAPERS

MICHAEL C. JENSEN
Social Science Electronic Publishing (SSEP), Inc., Harvard Business School, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Email: ">

Please contact us at the above addresses with your comments, questions or suggestions for ERN-RES.

Subscription Management

You can change your journal subscriptions by logging into SSRN User HQ. If you have questions or problems with this process, please email "> or call 877-SSRNHelp (877.777.6435 or 585.442.8170). Outside of the United States, call 00+1+585+4428170.

Site Subscription Membership

Many university departments and other institutions have purchased site subscriptions covering all of the eJournals in a particular network. If you want to subscribe to any of the SSRN eJournals, you may be able to do so without charge by first checking to see if your institution currently has a site subscription.

To do this please click on any of the following URLs. Instructions for joining the site are included on these pages.

If your institution or department is not listed as a site, we would be happy to work with you to set one up. Please contact "> for more information.

Individual Membership (for those not covered by a site subscription)

Join a site subscription, request a trial subscription, or purchase a subscription within the SSRN User HeadQuarters: http://www.ssrn.com/subscribe

Financial Hardship

If you are undergoing financial hardship and believe you cannot pay for an eJournal, please send a detailed explanation to ">


To ensure delivery of this eJournal, please add "> (Economics Research Network) to your email contact list. If you are missing an issue or are having any problems with your subscription, please Email "> or call 877-SSRNHELP (877.777.6435 or 585.442.8170).

FORWARDING & REDISTRIBUTION

Subscriptions to the journal are for single users. You may forward a particular eJournal issue, or an excerpt from an issue, to an individual or individuals who might be interested in it. It is a violation of copyright to redistribute this eJournal on a recurring basis to another person or persons, without the permission of Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. For information about individual subscriptions and site subscriptions, please contact us at ">

Copyright © 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved

 



  • [ceis_seminars_phd] ERN CEIS: Centre for Economic & International Studies Working Paper Series, Vol. 14 No. 1, 02/10/2016, Barbara Piazzi

Archivio con motore MhonArc 2.6.16.

§